Federal / national
National work or coordination across regions, within the written mandate and granted permissions. A national role does not automatically open every record.
These are appointed working and oversight roles. An expression of interest does not confer a title or authority. Describe your skills, availability and the work that interests you; the owner or an authorized administrator reviews the request within their permissions and jurisdiction.
The examples below help you prepare a contribution. They do not create new eligibility rules, minimum hours, professional credentials or adopted policy. Courses and blank templates are free to explore; training does not replace an appointment.
Nazir
National work or coordination across regions, within the written mandate and granted permissions. A national role does not automatically open every record.
Work within the authorized province or territory. Refer national or out-of-region matters to the appropriate lead rather than expanding your own mandate.
Describe this local focus in your experience. The form currently uses the two levels above; local work must fit an authorized mandate and does not create a third access level.
Open a role for duties, an example output, review boundaries and a first preparation task. Links open existing courses and blank templates; practise with fictional or public information.
Keep application review, member records and standing decisions understandable and traceable.
A review note identifying the application reference, current status, evidence considered, decision-maker and next action.
Coordinate with people administration on placement and with request administration on corrections. An application, proposed tier or payment plan does not activate membership; only authorized administrators make permitted status changes. Refer your own application to an uninvolved reviewer.
Using fictional details, draft a decision record for an incomplete application and list what must be clarified without collecting extra personal information.
Route access, correction, privacy, accessibility and conduct requests to the appropriate authorized reviewer.
A restricted request log with an assigned owner, documented response or referral and a clear closure reason.
Work with the relevant record owner and an uninvolved reviewer for complaints or conflicts. A request-management grant is separate from access to every underlying record; do not disclose third-party or privileged information through a public form.
Practise logging a fictional correction request with P-02, then identify which facts require verification and who may decide.
Match offered skills and availability to a defined task with support, feedback and a responsible next step.
A placement plan naming the task, supervisor, permitted access, support needs and review date.
Coordinate with research and regional leads; authorized administrators decide appointments and grants. Open research volunteering is free and separate from screening for protected roles. A workshop observation is feedback, not a professional credential or automatic clearance.
Build a fictional G-09 placement plan and use G-10 to record one demonstrated skill, one uncertainty and one next task.
Turn a broad concern into a bounded research plan, with distinct research, review and release responsibilities.
A scoped R-02 plan with assigned tasks, source priorities, review checkpoints and a recorded handover.
Researchers collect and explain evidence; reviewers control their own assessment. Coordinators resolve scope and record disagreements without rewriting an independent finding to fit a desired position. Internal assignments remain subject to existing project access.
Choose a public question and prepare an R-01 intake plus an R-02 plan with one exclusion and a contrary-evidence search.
Build a source record that another person can check, including uncertainty and evidence that challenges your initial view.
A source register and evidence matrix linking each finding to a precise source, contrary material and unresolved gaps.
Agree scope with the coordinator and provide reviewers with traceable records. Research does not authorize legal advice, public allegations or release of private material. Use the open research route for public contributions; protected projects require their own permission.
Take one public document, log its source in R-05, build two evidence rows in R-06 and note one limitation or contrary source.
Test a draft’s sources, reasoning and limitations without taking over the research or promising a preferred result.
An R-15 review report with supported findings, limitations, unresolved disagreements and an R-16 correction trail.
Coordinate document access and deadlines with the research coordinator while retaining control of findings. Do not review your own work as independent, grant yourself access or treat review as permission to publish. Release remains a separate authorized decision.
Review a public or fictional evidence matrix: verify one citation, find one unsupported inference and write a proportionate correction.
Prepare an accurate, authorized handover so counsel can exercise independent professional judgment.
An R-17 handover inventory referencing the approved package, transfer authority, receipt and outstanding questions.
Work with researchers, privacy reviewers and the authorized organizational contact. This role is not a lawyer appointment and does not permit legal advice, instructions outside a mandate or control of counsel’s conclusions. Do not assume a document becomes privileged because it is placed in a liaison package.
Prepare a fictional R-17 inventory using public documents; separate the question for counsel from your factual summary and assumptions.
Explain verified work in plain language while keeping sources, uncertainty, consent and approval visible.
A sourced bilingual draft with a publication approval record and a list of remaining accessibility or factual issues.
Researchers check source fidelity, bilingual/accessibility reviewers check presentation, and an authorized person decides release. Writing or translating content does not confer spokesperson authority. Do not claim that a draft policy is adopted or that a review check was performed when it was not.
Write a short explainer from one public source; use C-01 and C-09 to list the checks and approvals still needed before publication.
Prepare a precise, evidence-based request for the right decision-maker under a defined mandate.
An approved L-07 briefing, mandate reference and L-22 receipt/follow-up record rather than an unsupported claim of influence.
Coordinate with the authorized advocacy lead and research reviewers. Verify applicable lobbying rules and the written mandate before real contact; training does not itself authorize representation. Independent review must remain free to challenge the evidence. An acknowledgment is not agreement and silence is not an admission.
Use a fictional consultation to draft one supported request and an L-01 applicability check; rehearse without contacting an official.
Connect local participation to a clear provincial or national assignment without expanding its authority.
A local activity plan linked to a written role mandate, task owners, review dates and an accurate meeting or follow-up record.
Work with the appointed provincial/territorial or national coordinator and preserve independent research review. The application currently offers national and provincial/territorial levels; describe a riding or municipal focus in your experience field. Local coordination does not create a separate elected office, national authority or speaking mandate.
Outline a fictional local activity with G-02 and G-09; for a municipal delegation, read the municipal lesson and identify the local process to verify.
Prepare clear budgets, approval records and reconciliations while respecting systems that have not yet launched.
A draft budget/variance report and reconciliation checklist with evidence references, reviewer and outstanding items.
Work with the authorized treasury/operations decision-maker and an uninvolved reviewer; do not approve your own expense. These templates do not activate payment collection, banking, procurement or accounting integrations. Spending authority and any payment launch require their separate explicit approvals.
Using fictional amounts, complete an F-01 approval and an F-05 variance note; identify who authorizes, records and independently checks each step.
Make participation easier to understand and use across English, French, devices and access needs.
A C-09 review with language checks, observed barriers, proposed fixes and clearly identified checks still outstanding.
Collaborate with content owners and people arranging participation; ask for only the information needed to support access. Source/legal reviewers retain responsibility for substance, and authorized owners decide publication. Translation does not authorize a new policy position or certify comprehensive accessibility compliance.
Review one public training page in both languages, record one meaning or navigation issue and propose a plain-language correction using C-09.
Keep authority, decisions, conflicts and follow-up visible without treating proposed governance as already adopted.
A decision/minutes package with mandate references, conflict handling, dissent where relevant and a reviewable action list.
Work with the authorized decision-maker, recorder and uninvolved reviewers. Record a decision accurately without conferring powers that do not exist. Draft policies, public polls and proposed representative structures do not become adopted rules or binding ballots through this role; independent reviewers control their findings.
Write fictional G-03 minutes and a G-01 decision record, identify one conflict and state which authority would be needed before action.
To start without an appointment, explore courses, templates and open research. Membership, volunteering and appointment are separate processes.
Fields marked with an asterisk are required. A role chosen from the cards is retained when switching language; unsent form edits are not saved.